<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I professional enough for CellarTracker?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/</link>
	<description>Wine, wine, wine, more wine and motherhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Middleton</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Middleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the comments, everyone.  Seems like the quandary&#039;s resolution is out of my hand, regardless of my professional status.  ;-)

I&#039;m definitely in good company, though, on CT!  I agree that it&#039;s not pretty to look at, but I must say it&#039;s one of the most useful pieces of free software I&#039;ve encountered since Gmail.  I look forward to sifting through my wineblogger colleagues&#039; TNs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the comments, everyone.  Seems like the quandary&#8217;s resolution is out of my hand, regardless of my professional status.  <img src='http://wine-scamp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely in good company, though, on CT!  I agree that it&#8217;s not pretty to look at, but I must say it&#8217;s one of the most useful pieces of free software I&#8217;ve encountered since Gmail.  I look forward to sifting through my wineblogger colleagues&#8217; TNs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Debs</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Debs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>You did use winescamp. Nice cellar. Can&#039;t wait to read your tasting notes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did use winescamp. Nice cellar. Can&#8217;t wait to read your tasting notes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Debs</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Debs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Andrea, they choose the &quot;professionals,&quot; so even though I think you would qualify, it&#039;s not clear how Eric selects them. But it&#039;s his database, so he gets to decide. However, it is possible to search for reviews by using the searchbox and typing in a user name, then using the pulldown to search under &quot;users.&quot; Most people have easily figured out usernames. Mine is &quot;drdebs.&quot; Brooklynguy&#039;s is &quot;brooklynguy.&quot; Monkuwino is &quot;monkuboy,&quot; and eljefetwisted is, well, you guessed it.

I would agree that the database&#039;s look is simple, but I would argue with Ryan that the reason this site &quot;works better than any other wine tasting note site&quot; is precisely because Eric works on functionality rather than bells, whistles, friend groups, buddies, and all the other stuff that so many of his competitors front-loaded into sites that simply don&#039;t have the traffic to be truly useful. 

So I&#039;m glad you made is on there--I&#039;m guessing your user name is &quot;winescamp&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, they choose the &#8220;professionals,&#8221; so even though I think you would qualify, it&#8217;s not clear how Eric selects them. But it&#8217;s his database, so he gets to decide. However, it is possible to search for reviews by using the searchbox and typing in a user name, then using the pulldown to search under &#8220;users.&#8221; Most people have easily figured out usernames. Mine is &#8220;drdebs.&#8221; Brooklynguy&#8217;s is &#8220;brooklynguy.&#8221; Monkuwino is &#8220;monkuboy,&#8221; and eljefetwisted is, well, you guessed it.</p>
<p>I would agree that the database&#8217;s look is simple, but I would argue with Ryan that the reason this site &#8220;works better than any other wine tasting note site&#8221; is precisely because Eric works on functionality rather than bells, whistles, friend groups, buddies, and all the other stuff that so many of his competitors front-loaded into sites that simply don&#8217;t have the traffic to be truly useful. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m glad you made is on there&#8211;I&#8217;m guessing your user name is &#8220;winescamp&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>I think Cellartracker just needs a &quot;private notes&quot; feature. Professional as people pointed out on Catavino are people who get paid to do what they do. We are professional by this definition, though we still give away our notes. If anything my large cache of notes help to draw attention to what we are doing and therefore qualify as advertising of a sort.

As to cellartracker, it is such a great database and crappy website. There is so much they could offer to make this site  more dynamic and better organized. Jill, you can build an RSS feed from a users notes, but it is not easy. It on the other hand would be an easy thing for Eric to implement. Infact the one thing I want most on CT is a profile page, where I can really take ownership of what I put there. 

Currently though it&#039;s just a ugly database, that works better than any other wine tasting note site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cellartracker just needs a &#8220;private notes&#8221; feature. Professional as people pointed out on Catavino are people who get paid to do what they do. We are professional by this definition, though we still give away our notes. If anything my large cache of notes help to draw attention to what we are doing and therefore qualify as advertising of a sort.</p>
<p>As to cellartracker, it is such a great database and crappy website. There is so much they could offer to make this site  more dynamic and better organized. Jill, you can build an RSS feed from a users notes, but it is not easy. It on the other hand would be an easy thing for Eric to implement. Infact the one thing I want most on CT is a profile page, where I can really take ownership of what I put there. </p>
<p>Currently though it&#8217;s just a ugly database, that works better than any other wine tasting note site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty simple...&quot;professional&quot; means that you write about or review wine for a living full-time. Only you know if that describes you or not!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple&#8230;&#8221;professional&#8221; means that you write about or review wine for a living full-time. Only you know if that describes you or not!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wine-scamp.com/2008/02/12/am-i-professional-enough-for-cellartracker/#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think you&#039;re professional enough. The one thing I find a little curious about Cellartracker (which I&#039;ve always loved, btw, and think is the best tool out there for databasing personal wine collections) is their new &quot;Professional Reviews&quot; that automatically pop up whenever you search for a wine that sources they&#039;ve selected happen to have reviewed. These &quot;Professional reviews&quot; are from bloggers/vloggers, and I think it&#039;s great that bloggers are getting their due. 

However, how they select which bloggers to deem &quot;professional&quot; (only a few) and which to exclude (99.9% of the rest of the wine blogosphere) is mysterious. Personally, I would prefer to be able to input the usernames of Cellartracker-ers whose reviews I always want to see, sort of an RSS feed of sorts, so that I can check out the Scamp&#039;s, Dr. Debs&#039;, Jeff Lefevere&#039;s opinion when I&#039;m looking into a particular wine, without having to input the usernames and handles to see if they happen to have tried the wine in question. 

Do you know if something like this is possible? I haven&#039;t been able to figure it out if so, but I&#039;m a technological dummy so that doesn&#039;t mean it doesn&#039;t exist.

I guess all of this is to say that I like the democratic aspects of Cellartracker, and there&#039;s something a little strange about designating from the top down who is a professional and who isn&#039;t (short of Parker, Spectator, Allen Meadows).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think you&#8217;re professional enough. The one thing I find a little curious about Cellartracker (which I&#8217;ve always loved, btw, and think is the best tool out there for databasing personal wine collections) is their new &#8220;Professional Reviews&#8221; that automatically pop up whenever you search for a wine that sources they&#8217;ve selected happen to have reviewed. These &#8220;Professional reviews&#8221; are from bloggers/vloggers, and I think it&#8217;s great that bloggers are getting their due. </p>
<p>However, how they select which bloggers to deem &#8220;professional&#8221; (only a few) and which to exclude (99.9% of the rest of the wine blogosphere) is mysterious. Personally, I would prefer to be able to input the usernames of Cellartracker-ers whose reviews I always want to see, sort of an RSS feed of sorts, so that I can check out the Scamp&#8217;s, Dr. Debs&#8217;, Jeff Lefevere&#8217;s opinion when I&#8217;m looking into a particular wine, without having to input the usernames and handles to see if they happen to have tried the wine in question. </p>
<p>Do you know if something like this is possible? I haven&#8217;t been able to figure it out if so, but I&#8217;m a technological dummy so that doesn&#8217;t mean it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>I guess all of this is to say that I like the democratic aspects of Cellartracker, and there&#8217;s something a little strange about designating from the top down who is a professional and who isn&#8217;t (short of Parker, Spectator, Allen Meadows).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

